Basic Legal Principle
- A design must focus on aesthetic or visual features to qualify for registration.
- Functional elements are not protected under the Designs Act, 2000.
- The law protects only those features that appeal to the eye.
- A design must not be dictated solely by the article’s function.
- The design should serve a decorative purpose rather than a utilitarian one.
Treatment of Functional Elements
- Functional features can exist in a design but are not eligible for protection.
- Only the ornamental aspects of a product with functional use can be registered.
- If the functional elements dominate the design, registration is not allowed.
- Aesthetic additions to functional articles can be protected if separable.
- The design must not affect the mechanical or technical performance of the product.
Examination and Rejection Criteria
- The Design Office examines if the design is purely functional.
- Designs that lack decorative value are likely to be rejected.
- If the design exists only to perform a function, it is not registrable.
- The application must clearly emphasize the visual features.
- The burden lies on the applicant to show aesthetic distinction.
Examples of Permissible Cases
- A handle with a unique shape may be registered if the shape is decorative.
- A bottle design can be protected if the contour adds visual appeal.
- A product with both functional and ornamental parts may receive partial protection.
- Registered designs must not claim protection for functional engineering.
- Items like containers, cases, and tools can be protected if their shape is novel.
Legal and Commercial Implications
- Functional features may be eligible for patent protection instead.
- Design registration offers no protection for technical utility.
- Misclassifying a functional item as a design can lead to invalidation.
- Designers must balance visual creativity with utility constraints.
- Legal clarity is essential to avoid infringement and ensure enforceability.



0 Comments