Lack of Distinctiveness
- The trademark is generic, descriptive, or commonplace in nature.
- It does not have the ability to distinguish the goods or services of one entity from another.
- Marks that merely describe the quality, quantity, intended purpose, or value are often refused.
- Trademarks made up of common trade phrases or dictionary words may not qualify.
Similarity to Existing Marks
- The proposed mark is identical or deceptively similar to an already registered or pending trademark.
- The Registrar may find a likelihood of confusion or deception among the public.
- Visual, phonetic, or conceptual similarities with existing marks often lead to objections.
- The resemblance may affect consumers’ ability to identify the source of goods or services.
Prohibited or Restricted Elements
- The mark includes prohibited symbols, national emblems, or government insignia.
- Use of scandalous, obscene, or offensive terms is not permitted.
- Trademarks that may hurt religious sentiments or violate public morality are rejected.
- Use of protected words or symbols under international treaties can also lead to refusal.
Application Deficiencies
- Incorrect or incomplete information provided in the application form.
- Filing in the wrong class or not clearly specifying the goods/services.
- Non-payment or incorrect payment of the government fee.
- Missing or invalid Power of Attorney or other required documents.
Bad Faith or Misrepresentation
- The applicant is not the true proprietor of the mark.
- The application appears to have been made with dishonest intent or to exploit another’s goodwill.
- Marks that closely imitate famous or well-known brands without authorization may be refused.
- Prior use by another party may also lead to opposition and subsequent rejection.



0 Comments