Hello Auditor

What is scrutiny under income tax?

Meaning of Scrutiny Assessment

  • Scrutiny under income tax refers to a detailed examination of a taxpayer’s return by the Income Tax Department.
  • It is conducted under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act.
  • The objective is to ensure the correctness of income, deductions, exemptions, and tax paid.
  • It helps the department detect under-reporting, misreporting, or evasion of income.
  • Only selected cases are taken up for scrutiny each year.

How Scrutiny Cases Are Selected

  • Selection is based on risk assessment, data mismatch, or random sampling.
  • Returns showing high-value transactions or inconsistent reporting may be flagged.
  • Cases are chosen through a Computer-Assisted Scrutiny Selection (CASS) system.
  • Manual selection may also occur in exceptional cases with prior approval.
  • Notices are issued under Section 143(2) to inform the taxpayer.

Types of Scrutiny

  • Limited Scrutiny: Focuses on specific issues such as mismatch in income or TDS.
  • Complete Scrutiny: Covers a detailed examination of all aspects of the return.
  • Manual Scrutiny: Rare, generally applies to exceptional or sensitive cases.
  • Type of scrutiny is mentioned in the notice issued to the taxpayer.
  • The scope cannot be expanded without proper authority.

Process After Notice

  • Taxpayer must respond within the time mentioned in the notice.
  • Documents, explanations, and evidence are submitted online or in person.
  • Assessment may be done through faceless scrutiny or traditional methods.
  • After review, the Assessing Officer passes an order determining final tax liability.
  • An intimation is issued under Section 143(3) with demand, refund, or nil outcome.

Implications and Precautions

  • Scrutiny does not mean wrongdoing but requires careful compliance.
  • Failure to respond or submit correct details may lead to penalties.
  • Proper documentation and recordkeeping help defend claims made in the return.
  • Assessment orders can be appealed if the taxpayer disagrees with findings.
  • Transparency and cooperation can help conclude scrutiny smoothly.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *