Hello Auditor

Was there a limit for cash payment of service tax?

Modes of Service Tax Payment

  • Service tax could be paid through internet banking, NEFT, or challan at designated banks.
  • Online payment was encouraged by the Central Board of Excise and Customs.
  • Payment was made using GAR-7 challans in physical mode or through the NSDL portal.
  • E-payment became mandatory for most taxpayers based on turnover.
  • Cash payments were restricted to very specific and limited scenarios.

Mandatory E-Payment Threshold

  • Assessees with a service tax payment of ₹1 lakh or more per financial year were required to pay online.
  • This limit was introduced to reduce manual payments and improve efficiency.
  • The rule applied to both individual and corporate taxpayers.
  • Exceptions were allowed only with prior approval from the jurisdictional officer.
  • This e-payment threshold ensured a structured and traceable tax system.

Circumstances Permitting Cash Deposits

  • Cash payments were generally allowed only for assessees below the ₹1 lakh limit.
  • In case of technical failure or lack of access to online banking, manual challan payment was permitted.
  • Special permission was sometimes granted by the Assistant Commissioner or Superintendent.
  • Payments in cash were deposited through authorized banks using a printed challan.
  • Documentation had to be retained for audit and verification purposes.

Banking Channels for Physical Payment

  • Selected public and private sector banks were authorized to accept physical payments.
  • The payment had to be made within the due dates to avoid penalty or interest.
  • A stamped counterfoil from the bank served as proof of payment.
  • Delays or errors in challan processing could be addressed through the bank or Range Office.
  • Manual payments were reconciled with department records during audits.

Regulatory Instructions and Compliance

  • CBEC issued circulars specifying the shift toward digital payments.
  • Non-compliance with mandatory e-payment rules attracted penal action.
  • Taxpayers had to monitor their annual liability to determine the applicable mode.
  • Periodic system upgrades phased out physical payments in favor of online tracking.
  • The transition aimed to streamline service tax administration and reduce cash handling.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *